Tides of War

Now insults? Funny Tank =) I fail to see where i've said this bug is Your fault. But if you wish to think that, have a blast.

Why should i PM a bug?? Your making a mountain out of a molehill. Usually if Tulla is on msn at the time i find things wrong, i tell him. Like the time zones and various events having incorrects times.

This other bug? Pressuming score bug? As i've posted, i had no idea it existed untill it was posted. Yes it was posted, so whoever started that must be a community pig also.

I fail to see how im meant to know you was responsible for the Referee ticket system? Guess i must have insider information again.

Ohh nooo, i did insult you.

How could i do this, your such a nice guy.

Sure your right, thats all a mistake, you didn't know and me does just making things up.

Your one of the most dirty person i ever met.

Imagine what for characteristics such a person must have and look into the mirror.

Meh best not say that =) @ Tzu. Before posting, please find where i have complained, i merely spotted a problem and posted in on UK NB:

http://www.airattack.co.uk/club/modules.ph...pic&t=28431

Looks like thats a complaint that topic eh.

The 1.5 format idea for the next USAAC matches sounds great......... Popgun is correct about the REFEREE not being able to see the pilots true identity. That's probably why the TAA matches won't allow it anymore. As far as the ref enforcing the 15k alt limit 15, he could take off and fly to 15k if need be, or have an in training ref fly at 15k..... Maybe we could have a couple test matches and see how it goes...just a thought..... Keep up the good work Popgun!!! and Thank you!!

off topic, don't read if you don't like off topic reading.......

Yo TANK, Thanks for all you do, many of us appreciate it!!!!! Not sure why anyone would have any complaints about someone working for free on a free game

Meh best not say that =) @ Tzu. Before posting, please find where i have complained, i merely spotted a problem and posted in on UK NB:
http://www.airattack.co.uk/club/modules.ph...pic&t=28431

Looks like thats a complaint that topic eh.

What you don't tell is that there is a board where only referees have access.

Sure just a mistake from you that the posting missed this board and landed in the open.

Nothing else it can be than a mistake or....?

All that has a long history and isn't done only with that posting.

There is a lot more, but it simply doesn't fit in here. Not from size and not from topic.

PS:

Sorry about that much off topic, but some guys i really cant smell.

I let it end here to make room for postings they stay with the topic.

What was the topic again ?

Ah yes, last team standing. I for one think it?s a fun to play game-format and would like to play it again sometime soon.

As with every league/ game-format responsible leaguemasters questioning the rules because they want/ have to be perfect. It is only obvious, responsible leaguemasters asking the participants/ users for their suggestions and opinions to become a good overview of what is wanted/ what is necessary to add to the rules and what is redundant and should be removed.

As always such topics on public forums reflecting the disunity of squads and single users. Nevertheless every single opinion and suggestion is wanted/ needed. A heated debate is in the nature of such discussions. It?s sad, when such topics degenerate to flame-wars but that?s ?AA-life?. I think the persons in charge and especially the leaguemasters are farsighted and responsible enough to find a suitable solution. Not every single user/ squad can be pleased all the times but as long as the majority is happy, it?s OK.

As we noticed in the past already, members and squads of different national communities having most different mentalities but tend to agree with each other when it comes to display at least a national - or squadwise unity. Only a few are capable to look beyond their own nose and to find compromises in the interest of the game, in the very first place. I?m sure this statement fits on all current ?national? leaguemasters, whenever it comes to decisions on ?international?leagues, they want to host. So whatever decison is needed and whatever decision is made, I?m sure it will be in the sense of the game and the majority of its users.

WOW WHAT WAS THE TOPIC HERE?? lol

guys take a chill pill no take 2 there small ...... teheee

so whats up with LTS?

i lost it through all the crying

my dad can beat up your dad

good luck getting through all the red tape pop

maybe a e-mail to CO's would have got you a little erther

=S=

n0 HaRm nO FoUl

AiRBoSS

can't we just get along

The Topic .. USAAC Sponsored LTS League.

It will happen. We just wanted input on the game .. do folks want to see a LTS League?

Answer is yes .. especially in the 1.5 type of format. USAAC will endevor to get the League in motion.... Let us all move on in that direction

Stay Tuned for more information. Soon this topic will be "LOCKED" so we can sort thru respnces and such and get all sorted out.

=============================================

=============================================

Side Note:

This is NOT a topic primary about TAGS that will be allowed (although related to 'rules'). There is already a thread for that topic, or start another, but do continue your debate without emotion and attack... if you feel up to it... in the proper area concering 'tags'.

In the end the issue concerning 'tags' will be decided by the appropriate govening body of each community for any given league they sponsor. Those that don't like the decission simply don't have to sign up for the League Its not a big deal .. there will be enough squads that will sign up where there is no shortage of competition. Those given squad(s) that don't sign up due to some rule they disagree with ... I see no fault with them at all... it is simply a 'choice'.

I don't know Noodles.

Looking back at your post on UKAA game related forum:

Madman

Right, usually when someone took the ticket, you can hit Referee Ticket system and usually they are listed there with whos taken them. Can't seem to see that anymore? Not sure if thats a problem, or if that feature has purely just been removed.

When I first read it, the ending "or if that feature has purely just been removed" has a distinct inference to someone with the ability to add and remove features on the CLP.

We all know most of the people who have that power, so, I do have to concur with Tank on this one.

You may not have directly pointed Tank as being at fault, but it definitely reaks of accusing in a round about way someone just purely removing it.

OFF TOPIC I KNOW....... Sorry

Accusing someone of what? I still fail to see how my post can be conceived as an attack on anyone. We know 3 people work on that site. Why is it bad to report a bug??? Didn't think you join the bandwagon Vipor, but hey =)

"but it definitely reaks of accusing in a round about way someone just purely removing it."

"Not sure if thats a problem, or if that feature has purely just been removed"

Why is saying someone removed a feature bad. Phear removed the TS info from our WS site. Guess im accusing Phear of removing it...