Page 3 of 3

Ship Ideas

Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2006 12:58 am
by East
All ships are alternate history accurate!

Ship Ideas

Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2006 8:37 am
by Theta Sigma
All ships are alternate history accurate!
You tell him, East! :lol:

Ship Ideas

Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2006 11:27 pm
by broadside
there is no alliance class (its really called the Asashio class, Japanese) Image

Ship Ideas

Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2006 8:45 pm
by Blo Ho
but with and alternate timeline different weapons could be used for instance instead of the bofors 40mm to could have been a kalashinikov gattling gun. it didnt but its just an example and i doubt there was a kalashinikov gattling gun ever or at least until the cold war or phalanx was invented

Ship Ideas

Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2006 9:46 pm
by broadside
thanks Blo Ho :)

Ship Ideas

Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2006 10:53 pm
by Blo Ho
just so you know kalashinikov did make a gattling gun but i dont know if its the first they made but i do know it was used during the cold war called the AK-630. there are pics at the following website. such a weapons system was used on the soviet Kirov Battlecrusier and the soviet Kiev Aircraft Carriers and possibly other ships but i dont know.

Ship Ideas

Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 1:31 am
by broadside
How come one of the pictures of the gatling gun seis "no climbing" in english?!?!?! 😳

Ship Ideas

Posted: Sat Apr 04, 2009 11:52 am
by Von Talon
Here is some

Carriers

IGN: Graf Zeppelin class

LFN: Ark Royal class

USN: Yorktown class

Carriers would be very slow and difficult to control. They would have about 10 5-inch cannons, and alot of Anti-air defence. The carrier could carry about 75 planes, bombers and fighters. They could be sent to attack any detected enemy ship. If they manage to destroy the enemy ship, planes would return to the carrier.

Planes

IGN: ME109 (fighter), JU87 (bomber).

LFN: Hurricane (fighter), Swordfish (bomber).

USN: Wildcat (fighter), Dauntless (bomber.

Bombers do more damage, but they are more vulnearable to enemy fire and aircraft. Fighters provide defence to bombers by attacking enemy fighters in flight path.

Pocket battleships/Heavy cruisers

IGN: Deutschland class

LFN: Takao class

USA: New Orleans class

Theese could be a real destroyercrushers. With 8-inch cannons and heavy anti-air defence, theese would take down easily a small taskforce. They are very vulneralbe to subs, so they need destroyer and corvette escorts.

Ship Ideas

Posted: Sat Apr 04, 2009 12:05 pm
by Jesper
Here is some
Carriers

IGN: Graf Zeppelin class

LFN: Ark Royal class

USN: Yorktown class

Carriers would be very slow and difficult to control. They would have about 10 5-inch cannons, and alot of Anti-air defence. The carrier could carry about 75 planes, bombers and fighters. They could be sent to attack any detected enemy ship. If they manage to destroy the enemy ship, planes would return to the carrier.

Planes

IGN: ME109 (fighter), JU87 (bomber).

LFN: Hurricane (fighter), Swordfish (bomber).

USN: Wildcat (fighter), Dauntless (bomber.

Bombers do more damage, but they are more vulnearable to enemy fire and aircraft. Fighters provide defence to bombers by attacking enemy fighters in flight path.

Pocket battleships/Heavy cruisers

IGN: Deutschland class

LFN: Takao class

USA: New Orleans class

Theese could be a real destroyercrushers. With 8-inch cannons and heavy anti-air defence, theese would take down easily a small taskforce. They are very vulneralbe to subs, so they need destroyer and corvette escorts.
E:RT-STH is not being developed :(

Ship Ideas

Posted: Sat Apr 04, 2009 3:42 pm
by Von Talon
I have heard about that. but was not very sure. So sad.