Page 2 of 5
Aircraft Carrier Classes
Posted: Tue May 04, 2004 4:34 pm
by East
You are correct, it is Bearn. It was decommissioned and we have it re-constituted for Portugals use in protecting the Azores.
Yes, we are heavily arming the carriers. We are also creating the planned but never created BattleCarriers. Starting with the conversion of the Bismark and the Tirpitz.
Here's a peek at our workups:
Bismark
and Tirpitz

Aircraft Carrier Classes
Posted: Tue May 04, 2004 5:02 pm
by Sub Lt. D. Abramczyk
omg:
Good Grief. Are those armoured flight decks?
Um, why are there FAA Swordfish on their flight decks?
IMHO(I think the term is), the Tirpitz looks a hell of a lot more dangerous than the Bismarck, but, er, why does she have a central island? THAT would be bloody dangerous for night ops. angel2:
Aircraft Carrier Classes
Posted: Tue May 04, 2004 5:37 pm
by Buxton
Give me the Bismark - think broadsides and gun elevation. Mind you, pivot turning the Bismark to get the enemy to starboard could be tricky!
/bux
Aircraft Carrier Classes
Posted: Tue May 04, 2004 6:17 pm
by Goalie
Hmmmmm, reminds me a bit of the USS FDR (Midway Class)
USS FDR, Midway Class
in it's original config, but several years after "these" conversions. Of course the Midway class hulls were laid as BB's in 43, then converted into CV's during construction.
Aircraft Carrier Classes
Posted: Tue May 04, 2004 6:52 pm
by Sub Lt. D. Abramczyk
Aye, but Commodore Hardwood could sneak up behind with a few CA's and pummel Bismark, which looks as though its only got a few 6 inchers aft.
Aircraft Carrier Classes
Posted: Tue May 04, 2004 6:54 pm
by Ulsterman
Hmmmmm, reminds me a bit of the USS FDR (Midway Class)
USS FDR, Midway Class
in it's original config, but several years after "these" conversions. Of course the Midway class hulls were laid as BB's in 43, then converted into CV's during construction.
You should have posted the Introduction on the main page as well
Introduction
The following series of essays and pictures regard a fictional set of Imperial Japanese naval vessels, and others, developed by my friend Admiral U. Furashita. These units never sailed the seas, except in the Admiral's imagination, as part of his "Victory Through Seapower" World War II wargame. I hope you are as amused by them as I am.
Just like Enigma, I guess

Aircraft Carrier Classes
Posted: Fri May 07, 2004 7:09 pm
by Sub Lt. D. Abramczyk
Hang on, something isn't right about that Bismark model. I mean the side elevation has the of the flight deck shadow on the starboard side of the hull, but the plan view shows the flight deck on the port side of the ship.
Aircraft Carrier Classes
Posted: Fri May 07, 2004 7:25 pm
by Ulsterman
Hang on, something isn't right about that Bismark model. I mean the side elevation has the of the flight deck shadow on the starboard side of the hull, but the plan view shows the flight deck on the port side of the ship.
You're right, you can also see it when you look at B-Turret. On the starboard shot the flight deck is clearly in front of B-Turret, but judging from the shot from above the flight deck must be behind B-Turret.
When you look closer you'll also see the secondary guns in front of B-Turret, below the flight deck, but in a starboard shot they shouldn't be visible at all.
Seems to be an inverted shot showing Bismark's port side.

Aircraft Carrier Classes
Posted: Sat May 08, 2004 6:50 am
by jammy-e
Are Hermes, Courageous, Eagle and Berne for the RNE or god forbid the IGN
Aircraft Carrier Classes
Posted: Sat May 08, 2004 6:55 am
by jammy-e
With Bismark and the Tirpit would it have been a real problem resetting the magazins and the ammo hoists, and how dose Bismark stear under engens alone :wink: with no Rudder